Onitemupdating detailsview new bedford dating com
One of the flexible and new features came with ASP. This data bound control is used to display the values of a single record from a data source in an HTML table, where each table row represents a field of the record.The Details View control allows you to edit, delete, and insert records. Now you can ask questions directly to me on my new site ASPForums. Net Question Answer site, specially started to allow visitors of this site ask their doubts and queries. Just click the Ask Now button and ask your question now.Basically I have a details view with product information in it, when the user clicks edit it goes into edit mode when I change any of the fields and click update it updates but with the old values.Here is my detailsview: I tried adding a label to my page and then once updated Name had been assigned the value of the textbox I tried assigning that value to the label and it printed out the old product name not the one in the textbox.To clarify this take a look into what's happen on the Item Updating event, if we checked the e. Keys collection before we set the Name filed as read-only filed we will find that this collection contains two Items: The Details View will not pass the read-only fields to the underlying data source and this is not an issue Details View designed like this.
If I were to work around by manually refreshing the row from on Item Updated, how do I reference that edited row? Even though my goal is achieved, I would like to get to the bottom of things.
But I can't see why it wouldn't be bringing back the new textbox values.
Recently I was tasked with encrypting/decrypting some data that could be edited using ASP. Along with the details view control, the legacy code used a SQL Data Source to select and update everything.
so why the heck if i set the event at the page load like the following the problem is resolved?
Ok, Now I'm sure this was working the other day and I don't think I've changed anything but now it's not working and I can't see anything wrong with the code.